You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: _posts/2015-03-25-offlineimap-history.md
+20-2
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ title: An history review
4
4
date: 2015-03-12 12:00
5
5
author: Nicolas Sebrecht
6
6
categories: community project
7
+
updated: 2015-03-17
7
8
---
8
9
{% assign icons = site.data.icons %}
9
10
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ A few developers did improve their own fork, silently. They used public reposito
84
85
85
86
Once the initial burst of the pending patches merged, I expected things to calm down. Again, I did not realized how I much I could be wrong.
86
87
87
-
**I almost collapsed under the patches...** thanks to some active and productive developers. If you're not new to the project, you already know the most productive of them at that time: **Sebastian Spaetz**. I think the project never hit so much activity before which was a good thing.
88
+
**I almost collapsed under the patches...** thanks to some active and productive developers. If you're not new to the project, you already know the most productive of them at that time: **Sebastian Spaeth**. I think the project never hit so much activity before which was a good thing.
88
89
89
90
We tried hard to improve and implement the features we wanted. Most have been done but some challenges failed, the biggest being setting up a good test suites despite the successive attempts.
90
91
@@ -147,10 +148,27 @@ Today, I think **it was the best thing we did**.
147
148
In order to allow others to involve themselves, I created the organization at Github, the one we have today, *like suggested by one of the users*. Three developers joined. Everybody involved but only one does regular contributions since then. You know him, I'm talking about **Eygene Ryabinkin**.
148
149
149
150
151
+
# OpenSSL licensing issue
152
+
153
+
In August, 2014 one of our user raised a new problem.
154
+
155
+
OpenSSL we use through imaplib2, has a license not compatible with the GPL. That sucks because it's a usefull implementation but we had to deal with this.
156
+
157
+
The best way to fix that was to add a clause to the current GPL license. Of course, this can't be done wihout agreement of all the contributors.
158
+
159
+
We had around 70-80 contributors and Sebastian has contacted them all. By chance, most of them replied so we could decide to go with the specific clause.
160
+
161
+
150
162
# The current situation
151
163
152
164
We are officially 5 in the core team. In practice, **Eygene did all the work alone for 2 years, if not 3**.
153
165
166
+
Sebastian won't contribute much anymore since he is now using Thunderbird.
167
+
168
+
> What a 180° turn, BTW! ;-)
169
+
170
+
The other maintainers are inactive for a long time.
171
+
154
172
{: .warning}
155
173
So yes, we are still open to new maintainers.
156
174
@@ -161,7 +179,7 @@ I am currently improving the documentation and introducing new docs for the main
161
179
162
180
So, what about all of this?
163
181
164
-
Well, **OfflineIMAP was promised by some people to a *precarious future*.** Today, we can proudly explain this was wrong.
182
+
Well, **OfflineIMAP was promised by some people to a *precarious future*.** Today, we can proudly notice this was wrong.
165
183
166
184
{: .warning}
167
185
**Since it started in 2002, it ran only around 6 months without a maintainer**. **During this period of apparent death, the software was still being improved by single developers.**
0 commit comments