Skip to content

Issues: cplusplus/sender-receiver

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
10 Open 15 Closed
10 Open 15 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Should the default implementation of bulk support cancellation? design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet needs-paper Needs a paper to be written P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#278 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
5
bulk doesn't explicitly grant permissions for customisations to execute f concurrently bug Something isn't working design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#277 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
1
bulk does not specify what customizations need to do with exceptions thrown from invocations of f bug Something isn't working design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#276 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
4
bulk doesn't give the caller a way to constrain how function can be executed bug Something isn't working design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#275 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
4
Should the receiver concept require that move-construction is nothrow? design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits
#226 opened May 16, 2024 by lewissbaker
2
[exec.when.all] Wording of impls-for<when_all_t>::get-env results in inefficient implementations of get_env() bug Something isn't working P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#199 opened Feb 22, 2024 by lewissbaker
1
change the adaptors to preserve the "non-dependently typed" property enhancement New feature or request P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21
#194 opened Feb 15, 2024 by ericniebler
@ericniebler
2
Do we still plan to integrate p2257's design for a blocking query? discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet enhancement New feature or request P1 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 tokyo Issues to be worked on in Tokyo 2024 workshop
#140 opened Dec 8, 2023 by ericniebler
@maikel
8
[execution.senders.adaptors.bulk] Should clarify that bulk customisations are allowed to decay-copy 'args' if required bug Something isn't working design discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#103 opened Dec 8, 2023 by ericniebler
4
Upper bound on lifetime of operation states design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting
#70 opened Dec 8, 2023 by ericniebler
6
ProTip! Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.