Skip to content

Issues: cplusplus/sender-receiver

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
12 Open 21 Closed
12 Open 21 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

potentially throwing run_loop::finish can cause sync_wait to call terminate or hang bug Something isn't working P0 wording
#329 opened Feb 13, 2025 by ericniebler
1
[exec.connect] wording needs to ensure that in connect(sndr, rcvr) that rcvr expression is only evaluated once bug Something isn't working P2 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits wording
#325 opened Feb 5, 2025 by lewissbaker
2
[exec.snd.expos] Not clear if get-domain-late should evaluate the get_domain() expression or default-construct a domain of the type returned by get_domain() bug Something isn't working wording
#324 opened Feb 4, 2025 by lewissbaker
receiver/sender constraint that checks get_env(rcvr) is valid redundantly checks the result is queryable editorial enhancement New feature or request wording
#322 opened Feb 3, 2025 by lewissbaker
2
receiver/sender concepts require get_env but this has a fallback that accepts any type enhancement New feature or request wording
#321 opened Feb 3, 2025 by lewissbaker
get_env() specified in terms of as_const() but this doesn't work with rvalue senders bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits wording
#296 opened Oct 22, 2024 by lewissbaker
3
run_loop::schedule() should not have set_stopped_t() in its completion signatures if passed an env with an unstoppable_token design needs-proposed-resolution This issue does not yet have a proposed resolution but needs one P0 wording
#294 opened Oct 16, 2024 by lewissbaker
Does basic-receiver need to constrain set_value/set_error/set_stopped on whether complete is invocable? discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet wording
#292 opened Oct 15, 2024 by lewissbaker
bulk doesn't explicitly grant permissions for customisations to execute f concurrently bug Something isn't working design P0 Paper exists Paper exists, either WIP or pending-wg21 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#277 opened Jul 12, 2024 by lewissbaker
1
get_env is not a query editorial needs-proposed-resolution This issue does not yet have a proposed resolution but needs one P1 wording
#243 opened Jun 3, 2024 by ericniebler
The specification of split should require that the input sender is only connected once. discussion We need to talk about this; there's nothing actionable here yet P0 wording
#129 opened Dec 8, 2023 by ericniebler
2
[execution.senders.adaptors.bulk] wording should indicate that f is called with i = [0, ..., shape-1] bug Something isn't working P0 pending-wg21 A paper or an LWG issue exits processed processed in a meeting wording
#102 opened Dec 8, 2023 by ericniebler
2
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.