week1/notes/day3.ipynb

{
 "cells": [
  {
   "cell_type": "markdown",
   "metadata": {},
   "source": [
    "# Day 3 - Frontier AI Models: Comparing GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and LLAMA\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "Today's focus is on exploring and understanding the differences between various Frontier Models, such as GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and LLAMA, to determine their strengths and weaknesses for commercial applications.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 🤖 OpenAI's GPT models, including the well-known GPT-4 and the newer 0101 Preview, are discussed.\n",
    "- 🌟 Claude by Anthropic, which includes versions like Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus, with the latest Sonnet version being the strongest.\n",
    "- 🎯 Google Gemini, the next generation of the Bard model, is highlighted for its responses in Google searches.\n",
    "- 🍁 Cohere, a Canadian company, is noted for its model using Rag to ensure expertise.\n",
    "- 🦙 Meta's LLAMA model, available through the metaAI website, is recognized as an open-source model.\n",
    "- 🧩 Perplexity, a search engine powered by LLMS, is discussed for its unique AI capabilities.\n",
    "- 💻 LLMS are commended for their effectiveness in writing code, debugging, and problem-solving, showcasing their remarkable capabilities.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Bullet Points\n",
    "\n",
    "- 🧠 LLMS excel at providing structured summaries for detailed and nuanced questions, offering valuable insights and research.\n",
    "- 🔍 They are adept at fleshing out notes into emails, blog posts, and more, showcasing their iterative and feedback-friendly nature.\n",
    "- ⌨️ LLMS are exceptionally skilled at writing code, providing precise explanations and solutions to complex problems.\n",
    "- ❌ Weaknesses include struggles with specialized knowledge and recent events, as well as blind spots where incorrect information is presented with confidence.\n",
    "\n",
    "# Day 3 - Comparing Leading LLMs: Strengths and Business Applications\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "In this session, we will be comparing different language models and asking various questions to assess their strengths and applications in business.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 💡 How to determine if a business problem is suitable for an LM solution?\n",
    "- 💭 Do the models recognize their strengths and weaknesses compared to other LLMs?\n",
    "- 🤔 What does it feel like to be jealous? A philosophical question to ponder.\n",
    "- 🔤 How many times does the letter A appear in a sentence? An intriguing challenge for the models.\n",
    "- 📊 Analyzing ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Commander Plus from cohere for insights.\n",
    "- 🤯 Explore the differences between models for better model selection.\n",
    "\n",
    "# Day 3 - Exploring GPT-4o vs O1 Preview: Key Differences in Performance\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "Exploration of GPT models from OpenAI, focusing on their performance in answering questions.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 💡 GPT provides carefully structured and reasoned responses to business problems.\n",
    "- 🤔 GPT sometimes gets simple questions wrong, showcasing limitations in tokenization strategy.\n",
    "- 🧠 O1 Preview, the strongest of OpenAI models, uses a chain of reasoning approach.\n",
    "- 🕰️ O1 Preview takes longer to answer questions but provides more accurate responses.\n",
    "- 🧩 O1 Preview correctly answers analogy questions, demonstrating its strength in reasoning.\n",
    "\n",
    "# Day 3 - Creativity and Coding: Leveraging GPT-4o’s Canvas Feature\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "Exploring the capabilities of GPT-4o in generating creative and imaginative responses, as well as utilizing the canvas feature for collaborative coding tasks.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 💡 GPT-4o surpasses previous versions by providing witty and fun responses to complex questions, showcasing its creativity.\n",
    "- 💻 The canvas feature allows for interactive collaboration with OpenAI, enhancing the coding experience.\n",
    "- 🎨 Using canvas, GPT-4o can iterate and rewrite code snippets, adding examples and improving functionality.\n",
    "- 🧰 Requesting modifications through canvas results in tailored solutions, such as excluding certain data or yielding unique results.\n",
    "- 🔄 GPT-4o can simplify code upon request, offering alternative and efficient implementations.\n",
    "- 🛠️ Utilizing the canvas tool proves to be an effective way to work through problems and generate ideas during the coding process.\n",
    "\n",
    "# Day 3 - Claude 3.5’s Alignment and Artifact Creation: A Deep Dive\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "This segment explores Claude 3.5 Sonnet New's capabilities, comparing it to other leading LLMs like GPT-4. It highlights Claude's strengths in ethical considerations, code generation via artifacts, and its unique approach to challenging questions, while also noting its limitations in certain factual accuracy tasks.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 🌟 Claude 3.5 Sonnet New is presented as a leading LLM, particularly favored by data scientists.\n",
    "- 🤔 Claude provides thoughtful and insightful responses to complex, emotional questions, like \"what does it feel like to be jealous?\"\n",
    "- 🔢 Claude struggles with simple counting tasks, demonstrating limitations in precise factual recall.\n",
    "- 🛡️ Claude prioritizes safety and alignment, often refraining from direct comparisons with other LLMs and focusing on its own strengths and weaknesses.\n",
    "- 🤝 GPT-4 demonstrates a willingness to compare itself with other models and offers detailed analyses of its capabilities relative to competitors like Claude.\n",
    "- 💻 Claude excels at code generation, using \"artifacts\" to create and manage code snippets, offering a distinct workflow.\n",
    "- 📂 Artifacts allow for version control and easy sharing of generated code, providing a powerful tool for collaborative coding.\n",
    "\n",
    "# Day 3 - AI Model Comparison: Gemini vs Cohere for Whimsical and Analytical Tasks\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "This section provides a rapid overview of Gemini and Cohere's Command Plus, evaluating their performance on various tasks, including humor comprehension, factual accuracy, and insightful responses. It highlights their strengths and weaknesses in comparison to other leading LLMs.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 🤖 Gemini Advanced shows a literal interpretation of humorous questions, lacking the nuanced understanding seen in other models like GPT.\n",
    "- 🔢 Gemini struggles with counting tasks, demonstrating inaccuracies in letter counting within a sentence.\n",
    "- 📚 Cohere's Command Plus offers thorough and structured responses to complex questions, drawing on a wide knowledge base.\n",
    "- ❓ Cohere provides detailed answers regarding its capabilities and limitations compared to other LLMs, though it avoids naming specific competitors.\n",
    "- 🧠 Cohere delivers a well-structured and detailed explanation of the feeling of jealousy, showcasing its ability to process complex emotional concepts.\n",
    "- 🔢 Cohere also fails in the simple letter counting task, further highlighting the common challenge LLMs face with precise factual recall.\n",
    "- ⏩ The segment concludes with a transition to exploring Meta AI and Perplexity in the next section.\n",
    "\n",
    "# Day 3 - Evaluating Meta AI and Perplexity: Nuances of Model Outputs\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "This section concludes the exploration of frontier LLMs by examining Meta AI and Perplexity. It assesses their capabilities in various tasks, including comparison to other models, factual accuracy, and image generation, highlighting their unique strengths and limitations.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 🤖 Meta AI, powered by Llama, provides adequate but not exceptional responses, particularly in comparing itself to other LLMs.\n",
    "- 🔢 Meta AI struggles with simple counting tasks, failing to accurately count the occurrences of the letter \"A\" in a sentence.\n",
    "- 🖼️ Meta AI excels in image generation, successfully creating images based on complex prompts like \"a rainbow of rainbows leaping from Hawaii to 17.\"\n",
    "- 🔍 Perplexity, a search engine-based platform, focuses on providing factual and research-backed answers, making it distinct from traditional LLMs.\n",
    "- 📰 Perplexity demonstrates strong capabilities in summarizing current events, providing nuanced responses to time-sensitive questions.\n",
    "- 🔢 Perplexity accurately counts the occurrences of the letter \"A\" in a sentence, showcasing its ability to handle precise factual tasks.\n",
    "- 🚫 Perplexity explicitly states its inability to compare itself to other LLMs, emphasizing its focus on providing information rather than engaging in comparative analysis.\n",
    "\n",
    "# Day 3 - LLM Leadership Challenge: Evaluating AI Models Through Creative Prompts\n",
    "\n",
    "### Summary\n",
    "\n",
    "This segment reflects on the capabilities of six leading LLMs, emphasizing their power and convergence in performance. It discusses the evolving factors that differentiate these models, such as price and specific features, and concludes with a fun, unscientific leadership challenge between GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Gemini 1.5 Pro.\n",
    "\n",
    "### Highlights\n",
    "\n",
    "- 🧠 All six LLMs demonstrate incredible power in generating structured and reasoned responses to complex questions.\n",
    "- 🏆 Claude tends to be a leader in benchmarks, known for its humor, succinctness, and strong focus on safety and alignment.\n",
    "- 💰 As LLM performance converges, price and features like rate limits are becoming key differentiators.\n",
    "- 🤖 A fun, unscientific leadership challenge is presented, with GPT-4 (Alex), Claude 3 Opus (Blake), and Gemini 1.5 Pro (Charlie) making pitches for leadership.\n",
    "- 🗣️ Alex (GPT-4) emphasizes adaptability and strategic adjustments in its pitch.\n",
    "- 🤝 Blake (Claude 3 Opus) focuses on fostering a collaborative environment and genuinely caring for the team.\n",
    "- 💼 Charlie (Gemini 1.5 Pro) delivers a concise, business-like pitch, emphasizing precision and effectiveness.\n",
    "- 📚 The next session will delve into the technical aspects of LLMs, including Transformers, tokens, context windows, parameters, and API costs.\n",
    "- 🚀 The speaker aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of LLM technology, catering to various levels of expertise."
   ]
  }
 ],
 "metadata": {
  "language_info": {
   "name": "python"
  }
 },
 "nbformat": 4,
 "nbformat_minor": 2
}