Skip to content

Validation of CPF is not 100% correct #150

Closed
@ajconradie

Description

@ajconradie

Validation of CPF is not 100% correct - it allows invalid CPF's
A CPF like '094.050.986-59ABCDEF' is valid according to the code and should be invalid

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions