You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, in the discussions I have not found a suitable answer, so thats why I wanted to open this thread.
Is there any plan to support underline in the future? Or is there a suitable workaround to get there already?
What I would need in my current project is the ability to use some underlined words, like this example:
use option A or option B
̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄
In examples this could be achieved with either of these formats:
- use ==opion A== or ==option B==
- use <u>option A</u> or <u>option B</u>
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi, in the discussions I have not found a suitable answer, so thats why I wanted to open this thread.
Is there any plan to support underline in the future? Or is there a suitable workaround to get there already?
What I would need in my current project is the ability to use some underlined words, like this example:
use option A or option B
̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄̄ ̄ ̄
In examples this could be achieved with either of these formats:
-
use ==opion A== or ==option B==
-
use <u>option A</u> or <u>option B</u>
Currently it looks none of those are supported
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions