Open
Description
Preconditions and environment
- Magento version 2.4.5 and older
Steps to reproduce
- Open Postman
- Send request V1/attributeMetadata/customer/custom with parameter dataInterfaceName (posibles values: \Magento\Customer\Api\Data\CustomerInterface::class or \Magento\Customer\Api\Data\AddressInterface::class)
- Send request V1/attributeMetadata/customerAddress/custom with parameter dataInterfaceName (posibles values: \Magento\Customer\Api\Data\CustomerInterface::class or \Magento\Customer\Api\Data\AddressInterface::class)
Expected result
Filter data by dataInterfaceName.
Actual result
No filter data.
Additional information
In the line 93 of the file vendor/magento/module-customer/Model/Metadata/CachedMetadata.php, can see that the parameter it isn't implemented.
But the method its filtering by $this->entityType (depending on the requested service).
If the parameter its deprecated, modify the API REST documentation, please.
Release note
No response
Triage and priority
- Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Use with concrete module component label E.g. "Component: Api" + "Catalog"Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmedMay be fixed according to the position in the backlog.Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report.The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branchIssue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it
Type
Projects
Milestone
Relationships
Development
No branches or pull requests
Activity
m2-assistant commentedon Aug 14, 2022
Hi @jdromerorajoy. Thank you for your report.
To speed up processing of this issue, make sure that you provided the following information:
Make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, Add a comment to the issue:
@magento give me 2.4-develop instance
- upcoming 2.4.x releaseFor more details, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.
Add a comment to assign the issue:
@magento I am working on this
To learn more about issue processing workflow, refer to the Code Contributions.
🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.
📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.
✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel
m2-assistant commentedon Aug 16, 2022
Hi @engcom-Echo. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇
Details
If the issue has a valid description, the labelIssue: Format is valid
will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until labelIssue: Format is valid
appears.Issue: Clear Description
label to the issue by yourself.Component: XXXXX
label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.2.4-develop
branchDetails
- Add the comment@magento give me 2.4-develop instance
to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.- If the issue is reproducible on
2.4-develop
branch, please, add the labelReproduced on 2.4.x
.- If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!
engcom-Echo commentedon Aug 16, 2022
Hello @jdromerorajoy,
Thanks for contribution and collaboration.
As per the code Analysis we have noticed that the parameter $dataObjectClassName is not used in function definition Hence we are confirming the issue.
Steps to reproduced
Please find the attached screen for your reference.
Thanks
github-jira-sync-bot commentedon Aug 17, 2022
✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/AC-6411 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.
m2-assistant commentedon Aug 17, 2022
✅ Confirmed by @AmyJZhao. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @AmyJZhao, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.