Description
Version
v18.14.0 - v22.7.0
Platform
Darwin x86_64
Subsystem
perf_hooks
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Executing this script:
// Established warning threshold for number of performance entries
// https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v22.x/lib/internal/perf/observe.js#L105
const performanceEntryBufferWarnSizeThreshold = 1e6;
for (let numEntries = 1e4; numEntries <= performanceEntryBufferWarnSizeThreshold; numEntries += 1e4) {
console.log(`Testing ${numEntries} entries`);
for (let i = 0; i < numEntries; i++) {
performance.mark(`mark-${i}`);
}
performance.getEntriesByName('mark-0')
performance.clearMarks();
}
console.log('Done');
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
100% of the time
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
The expected behaviour is that the script completes successfully given the number of performance entries at any time is below the established warning threshold:
...
Testing 980000 entries
Testing 990000 entries
Testing 1000000 entries
Done
What do you see instead?
With the default stack size of 984kB the script consistently fails at an order of magnitude lower than the established warning threshold:
...
Testing 110000 entries
Testing 120000 entries
Testing 130000 entries
node:internal/perf/observe:517
ArrayPrototypePushApply(bufferList, markEntryBuffer);
^
RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
at filterBufferMapByNameAndType (node:internal/perf/observe:517:5)
at Performance.getEntriesByName (node:internal/perf/performance:106:12)
at Object.<anonymous> (test_file.js:12:15)
at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1546:14)
at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1691:10)
at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1317:32)
at Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1127:12)
at TracingChannel.traceSync (node:diagnostics_channel:315:14)
at wrapModuleLoad (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:217:24)
at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:166:5)
Node.js v22.7.0
Additional information
This bug appears to have been introduced in v18.14.0 when #44445 added a usage of the ArrayPrototypePushApply primordial in filterBufferMapByNameAndType as part of an effort to eliminate usages of ArrayPrototypeConcat
.
ArrayPrototypePushApply
is a variadic function, which appears to be problematic in this instance because it’s being called with each element in the buffer of performance entries - each passed as individual arguments. The size of the performance entries buffer is effectively unbounded, so at scale the underlying Array.prototype.push
method is being called with an unbounded number of arguments resulting in massive stack frames which cause the maximum call stack size to be exceeded.
If this is, as it appears, to be a general risk with the usage of variadic primordials with unbounded argument lists it may at least be worth a callout in the primordials documentation on variadic functions.