My timer is slower than Scratch's timer

[RixInGithub]

Hello, coding and Scratching guys,

since the past year's November, RixxyX's project was good as dead, to be honest. So, I sat down to my chair and thought that I wouldn't let this happen. And, I did sorta that what I wanted, but, I see, when I make code like:

when gf clicked
reset timer
start measuring time :: #773c00
wait until <(time :: #773c00) = [2000]>
end measuring time :: #773c00
say (timer)

I see, that the process took... 51.32 seconds, instead of 2?! As described in the title, my timer is slower than Scratch's timer. My code for time is:

	startTime(args) {
		time = 0
		isMeasure = true
	}
	endTime(args) {
		isMeasure = false
	}
	returnTime(args) {
		if (isMeasure == true) {
			time += 1
		}
		return time
	}

In the start, written as:

var isMeasure = false
var time = 0

I have no explanation to what cause to my extension going... Nuts. Finally, can somebody help me to make my timer equal to Scratch's one?

[CST1229]

Your time block increments every time it is used, and the wait until block runs every frame (1/30th of a second). As such, your script essentially waits for 2000 frames (66.6... seconds, i have no explanation why it took 51.32 seconds for you, possibly inconsistent framerate) instead of 2 seconds.

[RixInGithub]

How could I make it increment every millisecond, not frame?

[showierdata9978]

You could multiply it by 1000 (milliseconds are 1000 times smaller then seconds)