Skip to content

breaking: rename lulc topic to land-cover and change filter #907

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Gigaszi
Copy link
Collaborator

@Gigaszi Gigaszi commented May 19, 2025

Corresponding issue

Closes #898

New or changed dependencies

Checklist

  • I have ensured my branch is mergeable with main (e.g. through git rebase main if necessary)
  • My code follows the style guide and was checked with pre-commit before committing
  • I have commented my code
  • I have added sufficient unit and integration tests
  • I have added new Hurl regression tests and checked all existing tests
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md

Please check all finished tasks. If some tasks do not apply to your PR, please cross their text out (by using ~...~) and remove their checkboxes.

@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ mapaction-rivers-length:

### IDEALVGI PROJECT ###

lulc:
land-cover:
name: Land Use and Land Cover
description: >-
Features related to land use and land cover.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This description is probably not right anymore. Lets shorten it to the first sentence.

https://github.com/jasp382/glass/tree/master/core/glass/ete/osm2lulc;
Schultz et al 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2017.07.014;
https://www.geog.uni-heidelberg.de/gis/ideal_en.html
TODO
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would just remove it for now. We might have one in the future though.

@@ -557,13 +557,9 @@ lulc:
endpoint: elements
aggregation_type: area
filter: >-
(landuse=allotments or landuse=animal_keeping or landuse=basin or landuse=brownfield or landuse=cemetery or landuse=churchyard or landuse=civic_admin or landuse=commercial or landuse=construction or landuse=depot or landuse=education or landuse=farmland or landuse=farmyard or landuse=forest or landuse=garages or landuse=grass or landuse=greenfield or landuse=greenhouse_horticulture or landuse=harbour or landuse=industrial or landuse=landfill or landuse=logging or landuse=meadow or landuse=military or landuse=orchard or landuse=plant_nursery or landuse=port or landuse=quarry or landuse=railway or landuse=recreation_ground or landuse=religious or landuse=reservoir or landuse=residential or landuse=retail or landuse=salt_pond or landuse=village_green or landuse=vineyard or natural=bare_rock or natural=beach or natural=dune or natural=fell or natural=glacier or natural=grassland or natural=heath or natural=landslide or natural=mud or natural=rock or natural=sand or natural=scree or natural=scrub or natural=shingle or natural=water or natural=wetland or natural=wood or waterway=boatyard or waterway=dam or waterway=dock or waterway=riverbank) and geometry:polygon
(landuse=* and landuse!=no) or natural=water and geometry:polygon
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need to include more values for natural key such as

"water", "riverbank", "reservoir", "basin", "dock", "canal", "pond"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants