✨ api-server: listing of all solver jobs

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

This PR exposes in the public API, listing of all solver jobs (list_all_solver_jobs) as dev-feature

Controller-layer (public-api):

• Added a new API endpoint /-/releases/-/jobs to list all solver jobs with pagination (but not shown in OAS since include_in_schema=False)
• For the sake of clarity, filters to this listing will follow up in a separate PR (NOTE to @mguidon )

Service-layer

• Introduced a new list_jobs method in the SolverService class to fetch solver jobs with pagination and filtering by resource name prefix
• New dependency of SolverService with underlying webserver's rpc client
• Removed dependency injection in the constructors of services and clients and moved into api/dependencies. Depends creates a relation between service-layer and controller, therefore it should not be in the service-layer.

Schema and Validation Updates

• Renamed the creation_at field to created_at in the ProjectJobRpcGet model and updated corresponding schema examples for consistency.
• Added a new utility function trim_string_before to enforce string length limits during validation. (packages/models-library/src/models_library/utils/common_validators.py)

Related issue/s

• Part of 1. Support listing all solver jobs from a given user. This means implementing GET /v0/solvers/-/releases/-/jobs/page #7399
• Part of Refactor api-server to use controller-service-repository architecture and rpc communication with backend #7459

How to test

cd services/api-server
make install-dev
make test-dev-unit

Dev-ops

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.04545% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.69%. Comparing base (bc131b7) to head (35e758f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7566       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   73.68%   87.69%   +14.01%     
===========================================
  Files        1086     1744      +658     
  Lines       43753    67676    +23923     
  Branches      534     1135      +601     
===========================================
+ Hits        32238    59351    +27113     
+ Misses      11372     8011     -3361     
- Partials      143      314      +171     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.01% <0.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️
unittests	86.89% <92.04%> (-0.35%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	93.92% <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.38% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	92.73% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	85.26% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.27% <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	69.92% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	72.92% <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	90.90% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.72% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	92.77% <93.50%> (∅)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (∅)
catalog	92.64% <ø> (∅)
clusters_keeper	99.25% <ø> (∅)
dask_sidecar	91.30% <ø> (∅)
datcore_adapter	∅ <ø> (∅)
director	76.80% <ø> (∅)
director_v2	91.12% <ø> (+12.98%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	97.40% <ø> (∅)
dynamic_sidecar	90.15% <ø> (+1.09%)	⬆️
efs_guardian	89.79% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.18% <ø> (∅)
storage	87.56% <ø> (∅)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	86.10% <33.33%> (+26.91%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bc131b7...35e758f. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[matusdrobuliak66]

Thanks 👍 Let's go over the permission issue together. Also, in general, please keep in mind that we want to keep things flexible - for example, if we decide to introduce another Gateway in the future, like a CLI osparc tool, we should avoid a situation where different Gateways are talking directly to each other instead of communicating through proper services. Let say we would decide that jobs and projects and programs would be also exposed by the CLI tool..

[bisgaard-itis]

Thank you

[matusdrobuliak66]

Thanks

[pcrespov]

@mergify queue

[mergify]

queue

🛑 The pull request has been removed from the queue default

The following conditions don't match anymore:

• any of: [🔀 queue conditions]
  • all of: [📌 queue conditions of queue default]
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-neutral = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-skipped = deploy to dockerhub
      • check-success = deploy to dockerhub
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-neutral = system-tests
      • check-skipped = system-tests
      • check-success = system-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-neutral = unit-tests
      • check-skipped = unit-tests
      • check-success = unit-tests
    • any of: [🛡 GitHub branch protection]
      • check-neutral = integration-tests
      • check-skipped = integration-tests
      • check-success = integration-tests

[mergify]

This pull request has been removed from the queue for the following reason: checks failed.

The merge conditions cannot be satisfied due to failing checks:

You may have to fix your CI before adding the pull request to the queue again.
If you update this pull request, to fix the CI, it will automatically be requeued once the queue conditions match again.
If you think this was a flaky issue instead, you can requeue the pull request, without updating it, by posting a @mergifyio requeue comment.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud