Skip to content

merge queue: embarking master (83ec817) and #12697 together #12708

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Mar 21, 2025

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

Branch master (83ec817) and #12697 are embarked together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to speculatively check the mergeability of #12697.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue default for merge:

  • check-success=installer test on macos
  • check-success=installer test on ubuntu
  • check-success=tests on macos
  • check-success=tests on ubuntu
  • check-success=vm_tests
  • any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
    • check-success = installer test on macos
    • check-neutral = installer test on macos
    • check-skipped = installer test on macos
  • any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
    • check-success = installer test on ubuntu
    • check-neutral = installer test on ubuntu
    • check-skipped = installer test on ubuntu
  • any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
    • check-success = tests on macos
    • check-neutral = tests on macos
    • check-skipped = tests on macos
  • any of [🛡 GitHub branch protection]:
    • check-success = tests on ubuntu
    • check-neutral = tests on ubuntu
    • check-skipped = tests on ubuntu

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

---
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 12697
...

L-as and others added 2 commits March 19, 2025 18:36
Instead of calling `worker.waitForAWhile(shared_from_this())` etc.,
the subclasses of Goal instead call protected functions defined in Goal
that abstract over these.

The code for awaiting has also been heavily simplified.
Instead of calling `addWaitee`, then suspending,
`co_await await(waitees)` is called once, which also handles the suspend.

The end-goal is to remove all manual `co_await Suspend{}`s.
@mergify mergify bot closed this Mar 21, 2025
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/merge-queue/f642741f2c branch March 21, 2025 10:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant