Fix inconsistency when boxes is empty by inserting full ROI #2614
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for your contribution! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR types(PR类型)
Bug Fix
Description
When
boxesis empty, the full-size image is used as the inference input. However, the corresponding full ROI was not inserted intoboxes, leading to a mismatch whereboxes.size() == 0buttext.size() == 1.This behavior is inconsistent with the design documented, which specifies that
boxesandtextshould always have the same number of elements.This PR fixes the issue by properly inserting the full ROI into boxes.