Skip to content

ssvm: use mgmt network if no storage network #10735

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 4.19
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes #10163

Based on #10163 (comment)

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • build/CI
  • test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Fixes apache#10163

Based on apache#10163 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishek.mrt22@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 15.17%. Comparing base (f13cf59) to head (8b16209).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../storage/resource/NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.19   #10735   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     15.17%   15.17%           
- Complexity    11332    11335    +3     
=========================================
  Files          5415     5415           
  Lines        474893   474893           
  Branches      57920    57920           
=========================================
+ Hits          72046    72054    +8     
+ Misses       394792   394783    -9     
- Partials       8055     8056    +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 4.28% <ø> (ø)
unittests 15.89% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@shwstppr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blueorangutan package

@blueorangutan
Copy link

@shwstppr a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

@blueorangutan
Copy link

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13072

@@ -2738,7 +2739,7 @@ public boolean configure(String name, Map<String, Object> params) throws Configu
_inSystemVM = true;
}

_storageIp = (String)params.get("storageip");
_storageIp = (String)ObjectUtils.firstNonNull(params.get("storageip"), _eth1ip);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the logic looks good to me

may use MapUtils

MapUtils.getString(params, "storageip", _eth1ip);

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SSVM System VM fails to add static route to NFS server (ip route add x.x.x.x via null)
3 participants