Skip to content

fix: decorators not refreshing cached secrets on subsequent calls (#27) #59

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

ThirdEyeSqueegee
Copy link
Member

Issue #, if available:
#27

Description of changes:

  • Fix decorators not refreshing cached secrets over multiple calls to decorated functions

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee requested a review from a team as a code owner March 28, 2025 20:18
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.10%. Comparing base (d8a5366) to head (8f4cc1c).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #59      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.23%   98.10%   -1.13%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         261      264       +3     
==========================================
  Hits          259      259              
- Misses          2        5       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee merged commit c7e5fb1 into aws:master Apr 28, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants