-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
[release/9.0] Fixing Analyzer issues, servicing, Part 2: Actual Fixes #13182
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
KlausLoeffelmann
wants to merge
11
commits into
dotnet:servicing/RefactorAnalyzerTests9.0Rel
Choose a base branch
from
KlausLoeffelmann:FixAnalyzerIssues9.0Rel
base: servicing/RefactorAnalyzerTests9.0Rel
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7935110
Fix Analyzer issue, where we did not make sure to test for the _right…
KlausLoeffelmann d40fb65
Addressing the over-reporting issues in the MissingPropertySerializat…
KlausLoeffelmann 365caa7
Add specific Copilot instructions for writing Analyzer and CodeFix te…
KlausLoeffelmann 7b2aaa0
Update ReferenceAssemblyGenerator by LatestBuild Assembly resolver.
KlausLoeffelmann 3ba49f3
Add InvokeAsync Analyzer fix both for VB and CSharp and Unittests.
KlausLoeffelmann 8bdf958
Update tests.
KlausLoeffelmann 4436879
Fix VB tests and test data.
KlausLoeffelmann cc55027
Clean up comments and VB test data code.
KlausLoeffelmann 3ee6199
Fix Option Explicit placing in code.
KlausLoeffelmann dc7d6ca
Update prompt-folder for Analyzer test generation.
KlausLoeffelmann 80c449e
Address review feedback.
KlausLoeffelmann File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm concerned that eventually & will go out of support and will not be installed on the CI machines. Can we test only against 9 in the servicing branches?