Skip to content

Swift: Revert:Revert "Swift: CommonCrypto test cases for the BrokenCryptoAlgorithm query" #15106

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

geoffw0
Copy link
Contributor

@geoffw0 geoffw0 commented Dec 14, 2023

Revert #15094, that is, put back the test that was introduced in #13870 . These tests encountered an extraction issue on Linux CI. The goal of this PR is to get the test cases back in, as I don't want to lose them, with any problematic parts disabled so that CI passes. There are issues tracking fixing the extraction problem itself and for repairing the affected tests afterwards (this isn't the only one).

It will take me a few iterations to get this passing CI. Please don't review / merge until then.

@geoffw0 geoffw0 added the Swift label Dec 14, 2023
@geoffw0 geoffw0 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 14, 2023 14:22
MathiasVP
MathiasVP previously approved these changes Dec 14, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@MathiasVP MathiasVP left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM once CI is happy 🤞

@geoffw0
Copy link
Contributor Author

geoffw0 commented Dec 14, 2023

Thanks, I'm going to try and narrow down which part CI is failing on and uncomment some of the code...

@geoffw0
Copy link
Contributor Author

geoffw0 commented Dec 14, 2023

This is ready now, and CI is happy.

@MathiasVP MathiasVP merged commit 04ca36f into github:main Dec 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants