btrfs-progs: print csum values on superblock mismatch #985
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If in btrfs_check_super() we find that the superblock has a csum mismatch, print the wanted and found values, just as we do for metadata in __csum_tree_block_size(). When hex-editing a btrfs image, it's useful to use btrfs check to calculate what the new csum should be. Unfortunately at present this only works for trees and not for the superblock, meaning you have to use the much more wordy `btrfs inspect-internal`. Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If in btrfs_check_super() we find that the superblock has a csum mismatch, print the wanted and found values, just as we do for metadata in __csum_tree_block_size().
When hex-editing a btrfs image, it's useful to use btrfs check to calculate what the new csum should be. Unfortunately at present this only works for trees and not for the superblock, meaning you have to use the much more wordy
btrfs inspect-internal.