Proposal: add request data types

[DonnieRich]

Description

In this PR I added the logic to add a type based on the validation rules applied by the Form Request Validation.

Logic

Now in the GenerateCommand following methods (writeNamedMethodExport, writeControllerMethodExport, writeMultiRouteControllerMethodExport) there is a new field called request. It's an array created by the controllerMethodRequest method from the Route class.

The controllerMethodRequest check if the controller method as a FormRequest as one of its parameters. In this case it invoke the rules method and create a new instance of the Request class to parse all the fiels and rules returned.

The Request class applies some logic to select what should be the right types for each field.

As an example, the following validation rules:

class UpdatePostRequest extends FormRequest
{
  public function rules(): array
      {
          return [
              'name' => ['required', 'string', 'max:255'],
              'description' => ['required', 'string'],
              'price' => ['required', 'numeric'],
              'stock' => ['required', 'integer', 'between:2,33'],
              'hidden' => ['boolean', Rule::when(true, '')],
              'catalog_id' => ['required', 'integer', 'exists:catalogs,id'],
              'slug' => ['string', 'max:255', 'unique:products', Rule::excludeIf(true)],
              'image' => ['nullable', 'sometimes', File::image()->dimensions(Rule::dimensions()->maxWidth(1024)->maxHeight(1024))->min('1kb')->max('500kb')],
              'code' => ['required', 'string', 'max:255', 'unique:products'],
              'category_id' => ['required']
          ];
      }
}

Are converted into:

export type UpdatePostRequest = {
    name: string
    description: string
    price: number
    stock: number
    hidden?: boolean | 1 | 0 | '1' | '0'
    catalog_id: number
    slug: string
    image?: null | File
    code: string
}

Help wanted (and appreciated)

It would be useful to double check the types derived from the validation rules and the general logic.
I also tried to write a couple of test but testing only types declarations seems to be a bit tricky, so here someone with more experience than me could surely be of great help.

[joetannenbaum]

Hey this is great stuff, thank you! I also tinkered with this last week, if we decide to move forward I'll merge my work with yours and see what comes out the other side. Marking as a draft for now until we decide if we're going to pursue.

[DonnieRich]

Thanks to you man 😁
Yeah, no problem! I wasn't sure you wanted to add this feature, so I'm happy to know you were thinking about it too 😅

Should you need any help I'll gladly lend a hand 😁